When releasing, the releaser should read all the pull requests carefully
and do some adjustments because some of pull requests' labels are not
right when it's merged.
And the changelog tool needs to be adjusted. If one pull request has
both `bug` and `API`, it should mark it as `bug` but not `API`.
Backport #29339
Extract from #20549
This PR added a new option on app.ini `[admin]USER_DISABLED_FEATURES` to
allow the site administrator to disable users visiting deletion user
interface or allow.
This options are also potentially allowed to define more features in
future PRs.
---------
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
- Databases are one of the most important parts of Forgejo, every
interaction uses the database in one way or another. Therefore, it is
important to maintain the database and recognize when the server is not
doing well with the database. There already is the option to log *every*
SQL query along with its execution time, but monitoring becomes
impractical for larger instances and takes up unnecessary storage in the
logs.
- Add a QoL enhancement that allows instance administrators to specify a
threshold value beyond which query execution time is logged as a warning
in the xorm logger. The default value is a conservative five seconds to
avoid this becoming a source of spam in the logs.
- The use case for this patch is that with an instance the size of
Codeberg, monitoring SQL logs is not very fruitful and most of them are
uninteresting. Recently, in the context of persistent deadlock issues
(https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/220), I have noticed that
certain queries hold locks on tables like comment and issue for several
seconds. This patch helps to identify which queries these are and when
they happen.
- Added unit test.
(cherry picked from commit 9cf501f1af4cd870221cef6af489618785b71186)
---------
Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
Fix#28843
This PR will bypass the pushUpdateTag to database failure when
syncAllTags. An error log will be recorded.
---------
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Fix#29175
Replace #29207
This PR makes some improvements to the `issue_comment` workflow trigger
event.
1. Fix the bug that pull requests cannot trigger `issue_comment`
workflows
2. Previously the `issue_comment` event only supported the `created`
activity type. This PR adds support for the missing `edited` and
`deleted` activity types.
3. Some events (including `issue_comment`, `issues`, etc. ) only trigger
workflows that belong to the workflow file on the default branch. This
PR introduces the `IsDefaultBranchWorkflow` function to check for these
events.
GitLab generates "system notes" whenever an event happens within the
platform. Unlike Gitea, those events are stored and retrieved as text
comments with no semantic details. The only way to tell whether a
comment was generated in this manner is the `system` flag on the note
type.
This PR adds detection for two specific kinds of events: Scheduling and
un-scheduling of automatic merges on a PR. When detected, they are
downloaded using Gitea's type for these events, and eventually uploaded
into Gitea in the expected format, i.e. with no text content in the
comment.
This PR also updates the template used to render comments to add support
for migrated comments of these two types.
ref:
11bd6dc826/app/services/system_notes/merge_requests_service.rb (L6-L17)
---------
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
* use `setup(ctx, c.Bool("debug"))` like all other callers
* `setting.RunMode = "dev"` is a no-op.
* `if _, err := os.Stat(setting.RepoRootPath); err != nil` could be
simplified
Fixes#29101
Related #29298
Discard all read data to prevent misinterpreting existing data. Some
discard calls were missing in error cases.
---------
Co-authored-by: yp05327 <576951401@qq.com>
1. `playwright/test` is already installed as part of `deps-frontend` on
CI which runs before, so it's better to not install it again (on a
potentially different version), and just use the version from
package.json and add the `deps-frontend` dependency.
2. `PLAYWRIGHT_DIR` is a undefined variable, so I removed it
```bash
$ git show c8ded77680 | grep PLAYWRIGHT_DIR
+playwright: $(PLAYWRIGHT_DIR)
```
Fixes the reason why #29101 is hard to replicate.
Related #29297
Create a repo with a file with minimum size 4097 bytes (I use 10000) and
execute the following code:
```go
gitRepo, err := gitrepo.OpenRepository(db.DefaultContext, <repo>)
assert.NoError(t, err)
commit, err := gitRepo.GetCommit(<sha>)
assert.NoError(t, err)
entry, err := commit.GetTreeEntryByPath(<file>)
assert.NoError(t, err)
b := entry.Blob()
// Create a reader
r, err := b.DataAsync()
assert.NoError(t, err)
defer r.Close()
// Create a second reader
r2, err := b.DataAsync()
assert.NoError(t, err) // Should be no error but is ErrNotExist
defer r2.Close()
```
The problem is the check in `CatFileBatch`:
79217ea63c/modules/git/repo_base_nogogit.go (L81-L87)
`Buffered() > 0` is used to check if there is a "operation" in progress
at the moment. This is a problem because we can't control the internal
buffer in the `bufio.Reader`. The code above demonstrates a sequence
which initiates an operation for which the code thinks there is no
active processing. The second call to `DataAsync()` therefore reuses the
existing instances instead of creating a new batch reader.
Follow #29024
Major changes:
* refactor validLinksPattern to fullURLPattern and add comments, now it
accepts "protocol:" prefix
* rename `IsLink*` to `IsFullURL*`, and remove unnecessray "mailto:"
check
* fix some comments (by the way)
* rename EmojiShortCodeRegex -> emojiShortCodeRegex (by the way)
- Use case in `repo-commit` was tested until the point where the POST
request was sent with the same payload.
- Use case in `repo-legacy` was tested completely with comment editing.
- `jquery/no-fade` was disabled as well to stay in sync with
`no-jquery/no-fade`, had no violations.
For some user (as me), documentation lack of precision about where to
store issue/pr template.
I propose an enhancement about this point. With bold exergue and
precision about server itself.
I've found some user with same interrogation as :
https://forum.gitea.com/t/issue-template-directory/3328
---------
Co-authored-by: Km <cam.lafit@azerttyu.net>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
- Switched to plain JavaScript
- Tested the wiki creation form functionality and it works as before
# Demo using JavaScript without jQuery
---------
Signed-off-by: Yarden Shoham <git@yardenshoham.com>
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
- Switched to plain JavaScript
- Tested the repo migration form functionality and it works as before
# Demo using JavaScript without jQuery
---------
Signed-off-by: Yarden Shoham <git@yardenshoham.com>
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Lunny Xiao
6543
Earl Warren
Tim-Nicas Oelschläger
techknowlogick
silverwind
Kyle D
wxiaoguang
Yarden Shoham
Zettat123
Sebastian Brückner
KN4CK3R
GiteaBot
Jason Song
DC
Rafael Heard
vincent
6543
Şahin Akkaya
Johan Van de Wauw
Markus Amshove
